Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
cameracomparison · 2-way

ZWO ASI585MM Pro vs ToupTek ATR585C

ZWO ASI585MM Pro
ZWO

ASI585MM Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ToupTek ATR585C
ToupTek

ATR585C

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Key differences

Mono vs color

Specifications

SpecificationZWO ASI585MM ProToupTek ATR585C
Sensor
TypeDedicated CooledDedicated Cooled
SensorSony IMX585Sony IMX585
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format1/1.2-inch1/1.2-inch
Sensor size11.1×6.3mm11.2×6.3mm
Diagonal12.8mm12.8mm
Pixel size2.90µm2.90µm
Resolution3840×21603856×2180
Megapixels8.3MP8.3MP
ColorNoYes
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well38700e⁻
Peak QE91%91%
Advantages of ZWO ASI585MM Pro
  • Mono sensor — ideal for narrowband and LRGB
Advantages of ToupTek ATR585C
  • One-shot color — simpler workflow
Best for — ZWO ASI585MM Pro
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — ToupTek ATR585C
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
ZWO ASI585MM Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.55° × 1.43°Scale: 2.39"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.45°Scale: 0.75"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.18°Scale: 0.30"/px
ToupTek ATR585C — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.56° × 1.45°Scale: 2.39"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.45°Scale: 0.75"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.18°Scale: 0.30"/px
ZWO ASI585MM Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ToupTek ATR585C — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives