Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 vs William Optics Pleiades 111

William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
William Optics

Ultra-Cat 108

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Pleiades 111
William Optics

Pleiades 111

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics Ultra-Cat 108William Optics Pleiades 111
Optics
Typerefractorastrograph
Optical designPetzval (5-element advanced)Astrograph (7-element)
Aperture108mm111mm
Focal length518mm528mm
Native f/ratiof/4.8f/4.8
Image circle60mm45mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight8.0kg8.0kg
Advantages of William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of William Optics Pleiades 111

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Pleiades 111
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.98° × 2.65°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.60° × 1.74°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.25° × 1.25°Scale: 1.50"/px
William Optics Pleiades 111 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.91° × 2.60°Scale: 1.47"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.55° × 1.70°Scale: 1.47"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.23° × 1.23°Scale: 1.47"/px
William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Pleiades 111 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives