Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 vs SharpStar 100QII

William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
William Optics

Ultra-Cat 108

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 100QII
SharpStar

100QII

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-6% focal length
+8% aperture
Faster by 0.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics Ultra-Cat 108SharpStar 100QII
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval (5-element advanced)Quadruplet astrograph
Aperture108mm100mm
Focal length518mm550mm
Native f/ratiof/4.8f/5.5
Image circle60mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight8.0kg5.5kg
Advantages of William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
  • Faster optics at f/4.8 vs f/5.5
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of SharpStar 100QII
  • Lighter (5.5kg vs 7.96kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 100QII
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.98° × 2.65°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.60° × 1.74°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.25° × 1.25°Scale: 1.50"/px
SharpStar 100QII — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.75° × 2.50°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.45° × 1.64°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 1.18°Scale: 1.41"/px
William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 100QII — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives