Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P vs TEC APO160FL f/7

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 250P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

TEC APO160FL f/7
TEC

APO160FL f/7

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-11% focal length
+56% aperture
Faster by 3.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 250PTEC APO160FL f/7
Optics
Typenewtonianrefractor
Optical designNewtonian astrographApo triplet fluorite
Aperture250mm160mm
Focal length1000mm1120mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/7.0
Image circle
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight15.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Wider field — 1000mm vs 1120mm focal length
  • 56% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7
Advantages of TEC APO160FL f/7
  • Tighter framing — 1120mm vs 1000mm focal length
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — TEC APO160FL f/7
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
TEC APO160FL f/7 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.84° × 1.23°Scale: 0.69"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 0.80°Scale: 0.69"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.58° × 0.58°Scale: 0.69"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

TEC APO160FL f/7 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives