Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P vs William Optics FLT 156

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 250P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

William Optics FLT 156
William Optics

FLT 156

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-8% focal length
+60% aperture
Faster by 3.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 250PWilliam Optics FLT 156
Optics
Typenewtonianrefractor
Optical designNewtonian astrographApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture250mm156mm
Focal length1000mm1085mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/7.0
Image circle52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg11.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • 60% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7
Advantages of William Optics FLT 156
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (11.5kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 156
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
William Optics FLT 156 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.90° × 1.27°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.24° × 0.83°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.60° × 0.60°Scale: 0.71"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

William Optics FLT 156 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives