telescopecomparison · 2-way
DwarfLab Dwarf Mini vs DwarfLab Dwarf 3
DwarfLab
Dwarf Mini
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
-14% aperture
Slower by 0.7 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | DwarfLab Dwarf Mini | DwarfLab Dwarf 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | smart-telescope | smart-telescope |
| Optical design | Smart all-in-one | Apo doublet all-in-one |
| Aperture | 30mm | 35mm |
| Focal length | 150mm | 150mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.0 | f/4.3 |
| Image circle | — | — |
| Full-frame support | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.8kg | 1.3kg |
Advantages of DwarfLab Dwarf Mini
- Lighter (0.84kg vs 1.3kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of DwarfLab Dwarf 3
- 17% more light-gathering aperture
- Faster optics at f/4.3 vs f/5
Best for — DwarfLab Dwarf Mini
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — DwarfLab Dwarf 3
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
DwarfLab Dwarf Mini — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 13.75° × 9.17°Scale: 5.17"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 8.98° × 6.00°Scale: 5.17"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.32° × 4.32°Scale: 5.17"/px
DwarfLab Dwarf 3 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 13.75° × 9.17°Scale: 5.17"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 8.98° × 6.00°Scale: 5.17"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.32° × 4.32°Scale: 5.17"/px
DwarfLab Dwarf Mini — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
DwarfLab Dwarf 3 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
