Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron RASA 11 vs Tele Vue NP101is

Celestron RASA 11
Celestron

RASA 11

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Tele Vue NP101is
Tele Vue

NP101is

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+15% focal length
+176% aperture
Faster by 3.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron RASA 11Tele Vue NP101is
Optics
TypeastrographRefractor
Optical designRowe-Ackermann Schmidt AstrographPetzval
Aperture279mm101mm
Focal length620mm540mm
Native f/ratiof/2.2f/5.4
Image circle43mm40mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight20.0kg4.5kg
Advantages of Celestron RASA 11
  • Tighter framing — 620mm vs 540mm focal length
  • 176% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2.22 vs f/5.4
Advantages of Tele Vue NP101is
  • Wider field — 540mm vs 620mm focal length
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 20kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron RASA 11
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Tele Vue NP101is
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron RASA 11 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.33° × 2.22°Scale: 1.25"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.17° × 1.45°Scale: 1.25"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.04° × 1.04°Scale: 1.25"/px
Tele Vue NP101is — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
Celestron RASA 11 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Tele Vue NP101is — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives