Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron RASA 11 vs SharpStar 100QII

Celestron RASA 11
Celestron

RASA 11

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

SharpStar 100QII
SharpStar

100QII

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+13% focal length
+179% aperture
Faster by 3.3 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron RASA 11SharpStar 100QII
Optics
Typeastrographrefractor
Optical designRowe-Ackermann Schmidt AstrographQuadruplet astrograph
Aperture279mm100mm
Focal length620mm550mm
Native f/ratiof/2.2f/5.5
Image circle43mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight20.0kg5.5kg
Advantages of Celestron RASA 11
  • Tighter framing — 620mm vs 550mm focal length
  • 179% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2.22 vs f/5.5
Advantages of SharpStar 100QII
  • Wider field — 550mm vs 620mm focal length
  • Lighter (5.5kg vs 20kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron RASA 11
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 100QII
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron RASA 11 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.33° × 2.22°Scale: 1.25"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.17° × 1.45°Scale: 1.25"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.04° × 1.04°Scale: 1.25"/px
SharpStar 100QII — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.75° × 2.50°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.45° × 1.64°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 1.18°Scale: 1.41"/px
Celestron RASA 11 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

SharpStar 100QII — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives