Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway vs William Optics FLT 91

Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway
Astro-Physics

92mm f/6.65 Stowaway

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 91
William Optics

FLT 91

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+13% focal length
Slower by 0.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 StowawayWilliam Optics FLT 91
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo tripletTriplet APO
Aperture92mm91mm
Focal length612mm540mm
Native f/ratiof/6.7f/5.9
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.2kg4.5kg
Advantages of Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway
  • Tighter framing — 612mm vs 540mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.2kg vs 4.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics FLT 91
  • Wider field — 540mm vs 612mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.9 vs f/6.65
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — William Optics FLT 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.27"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.20° × 1.47°Scale: 1.27"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.06° × 1.06°Scale: 1.27"/px
William Optics FLT 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics FLT 91 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives