Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway vs SharpStar 94EDPH

Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway
Astro-Physics

92mm f/6.65 Stowaway

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

SharpStar 94EDPH
SharpStar

94EDPH

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+18% focal length
Slower by 1.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 StowawaySharpStar 94EDPH
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo tripletApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture92mm94mm
Focal length612mm518mm
Native f/ratiof/6.7f/5.5
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.2kg4.5kg
Advantages of Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway
  • Tighter framing — 612mm vs 518mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.2kg vs 4.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of SharpStar 94EDPH
  • Wider field — 518mm vs 612mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/6.65
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — SharpStar 94EDPH
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.27"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.20° × 1.47°Scale: 1.27"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.06° × 1.06°Scale: 1.27"/px
SharpStar 94EDPH — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.98° × 2.65°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.60° × 1.74°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.25° × 1.25°Scale: 1.50"/px
Astro-Physics 92mm f/6.65 Stowaway — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

SharpStar 94EDPH — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives