Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX vs ZWO FF110 APO

Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX
Astro-Physics

110mm f/6 StarFire GTX

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

ZWO FF110 APO
ZWO

FF110 APO

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-14% focal length
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTXZWO FF110 APO
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet Super-EDApo quadruplet ED
Aperture110mm110mm
Focal length660mm766mm
Native f/ratiof/6.0f/7.0
Image circle50mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight5.5kg5.7kg
Advantages of Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX
  • Wider field — 660mm vs 766mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/6 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (50mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of ZWO FF110 APO
  • Tighter framing — 766mm vs 660mm focal length
Best for — Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — ZWO FF110 APO
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.08°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.04° × 1.36°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.98° × 0.98°Scale: 1.18"/px
ZWO FF110 APO — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.01"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.76° × 1.17°Scale: 1.01"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.85°Scale: 1.01"/px
Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

ZWO FF110 APO — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives