Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX vs William Optics GT 102

Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX
Astro-Physics

110mm f/6 StarFire GTX

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics GT 102
William Optics

GT 102

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-6% focal length
+8% aperture
Faster by 0.9 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTXWilliam Optics GT 102
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet Super-EDApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture110mm102mm
Focal length660mm703mm
Native f/ratiof/6.0f/6.9
Image circle50mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight5.5kg5.6kg
Advantages of Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX
  • Faster optics at f/6 vs f/6.9
  • Larger image circle (50mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of William Optics GT 102

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics GT 102
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.08°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.04° × 1.36°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.98° × 0.98°Scale: 1.18"/px
William Optics GT 102 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.93° × 1.96°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.92° × 1.28°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.92° × 0.92°Scale: 1.10"/px
Astro-Physics 110mm f/6 StarFire GTX — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics GT 102 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives