telescopecomparison · 2-way
ZWO FF70 APO vs Sky-Watcher Evostar 72ED
Sky-Watcher
Evostar 72ED
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+17% focal length
Slower by 1.2 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | ZWO FF70 APO | Sky-Watcher Evostar 72ED |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo quadruplet ED | Apo doublet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 70mm | 72mm |
| Focal length | 490mm | 420mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.0 | f/5.8 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 2.5kg | 2.4kg |
Advantages of ZWO FF70 APO
- Tighter framing — 490mm vs 420mm focal length
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evostar 72ED
- Wider field — 420mm vs 490mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/5.8 vs f/7
Best for — ZWO FF70 APO
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evostar 72ED
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
ZWO FF70 APO — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.21° × 2.81°Scale: 1.58"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.58"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.32° × 1.32°Scale: 1.58"/px
Sky-Watcher Evostar 72ED — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.91° × 3.27°Scale: 1.85"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.21° × 2.14°Scale: 1.85"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.54° × 1.54°Scale: 1.85"/px
ZWO FF70 APO — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Sky-Watcher Evostar 72ED — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
