telescopecomparison · 2-way
ZWO FF130 APO vs Takahashi TOA-130NFB
ZWO
FF130 APO
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Takahashi
TOA-130NFB
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Specifications
| Specification | ZWO FF130 APO | Takahashi TOA-130NFB |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Quadruplet air-spaced APO (two ED elements) | Apo triplet |
| Aperture | 130mm | 130mm |
| Focal length | 1000mm | 1000mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.7 | f/7.7 |
| Image circle | 60mm | 88mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 10.5kg | 9.6kg |
Advantages of ZWO FF130 APO
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-130NFB
- Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — ZWO FF130 APO
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TOA-130NFB
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
ZWO FF130 APO — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Takahashi TOA-130NFB — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
ZWO FF130 APO — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Takahashi TOA-130NFB — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
