telescopecomparison · 2-way
ZWO FF110 APO vs Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100
ZWO
FF110 APO
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Explore Scientific
ED102 FCD-100
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
+7% focal length
+8% aperture
Specifications
| Specification | ZWO FF110 APO | Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo quadruplet ED | Apo triplet FCD-100 |
| Aperture | 110mm | 102mm |
| Focal length | 766mm | 714mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.0 | f/7.0 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 5.7kg | 5.5kg |
Advantages of ZWO FF110 APO
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Advantages of Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Best for — ZWO FF110 APO
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
ZWO FF110 APO — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.01"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.76° × 1.17°Scale: 1.01"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.85° × 0.85°Scale: 1.01"/px
Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.89° × 1.93°Scale: 1.09"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.89° × 1.26°Scale: 1.09"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.91° × 0.91°Scale: 1.09"/px
ZWO FF110 APO — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
