telescopecomparison · 2-way
ZWO FF110 APO vs Astro-Tech AT115EDT
ZWO
FF110 APO
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Astro-Tech
AT115EDT
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Specifications
| Specification | ZWO FF110 APO | Astro-Tech AT115EDT |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo quadruplet ED | Apo triplet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 110mm | 115mm |
| Focal length | 766mm | 805mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.0 | f/7.0 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 52mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 5.7kg | 6.6kg |
Advantages of ZWO FF110 APO
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT115EDT
- Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — ZWO FF110 APO
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Astro-Tech AT115EDT
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
ZWO FF110 APO — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.01"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.76° × 1.17°Scale: 1.01"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.85° × 0.85°Scale: 1.01"/px
Astro-Tech AT115EDT — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.56° × 1.71°Scale: 0.96"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.67° × 1.12°Scale: 0.96"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.80° × 0.80°Scale: 0.96"/px
ZWO FF110 APO — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Astro-Tech AT115EDT — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
