Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
cameracomparison · 2-way

ZWO ASI585MC Pro vs ToupTek ATR585M

ZWO ASI585MC Pro
ZWO

ASI585MC Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ToupTek ATR585M
ToupTek

ATR585M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Key differences

Color vs mono

Specifications

SpecificationZWO ASI585MC ProToupTek ATR585M
Sensor
TypeDedicated CooledDedicated Cooled
SensorSony IMX585Sony IMX585
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format1/1.2-inch1/1.2-inch
Sensor size11.2×6.3mm11.1×6.3mm
Diagonal12.8mm12.8mm
Pixel size2.90µm2.90µm
Resolution3840×21603840×2160
Megapixels8.3MP8.3MP
ColorYesNo
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well40000e⁻
Peak QE91%91%
Advantages of ZWO ASI585MC Pro
  • One-shot color — simpler workflow
Advantages of ToupTek ATR585M
  • Mono sensor — ideal for narrowband and LRGB
Best for — ZWO ASI585MC Pro
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — ToupTek ATR585M
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
ZWO ASI585MC Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.57° × 1.44°Scale: 2.39"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.45°Scale: 0.75"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.18°Scale: 0.30"/px
ToupTek ATR585M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.55° × 1.43°Scale: 2.39"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.45°Scale: 0.75"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.18°Scale: 0.30"/px
ZWO ASI585MC Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ToupTek ATR585M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives