Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics Ultra-Cat 131 vs Borg 107FL

William Optics Ultra-Cat 131
William Optics

Ultra-Cat 131

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Borg 107FL
Borg

107FL

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+8% focal length
+22% aperture
Faster by 0.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics Ultra-Cat 131Borg 107FL
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval (5-element advanced)Apo doublet fluorite
Aperture131mm107mm
Focal length648mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/4.9f/5.6
Image circle60mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight11.3kg3.5kg
Advantages of William Optics Ultra-Cat 131
  • 22% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4.9 vs f/5.6
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Borg 107FL
  • Lighter (3.5kg vs 11.3kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics Ultra-Cat 131
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Borg 107FL
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics Ultra-Cat 131 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.18° × 2.12°Scale: 1.20"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.08° × 1.39°Scale: 1.20"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.20"/px
Borg 107FL — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
William Optics Ultra-Cat 131 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Borg 107FL — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives