Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD vs William Optics Ultra-Cat 76

William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD
William Optics

RedCat 71 WIFD

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics Ultra-Cat 76
William Optics

Ultra-Cat 76

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-7% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics RedCat 71 WIFDWilliam Optics Ultra-Cat 76
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval APOPetzval (5-element advanced)
Aperture71mm76mm
Focal length350mm365mm
Native f/ratiof/4.9f/4.8
Image circle45mm50mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight2.7kg3.8kg
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD
  • Lighter (2.7kg vs 3.81kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics Ultra-Cat 76

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Ultra-Cat 76
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.89° × 3.93°Scale: 2.22"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.85° × 2.57°Scale: 2.22"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.85° × 1.85°Scale: 2.22"/px
William Optics Ultra-Cat 76 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.65° × 3.77°Scale: 2.12"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.69° × 2.46°Scale: 2.12"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.77° × 1.77°Scale: 2.12"/px
William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics Ultra-Cat 76 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives