Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics Pleiades 68 vs William Optics RedCat 51 WIFD

William Optics Pleiades 68
William Optics

Pleiades 68

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics RedCat 51 WIFD
William Optics

RedCat 51 WIFD

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+33% aperture
Faster by 1.1 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics Pleiades 68William Optics RedCat 51 WIFD
Optics
TypeastrographRefractor
Optical designAstrograph (7-element)Petzval APO
Aperture68mm51mm
Focal length260mm250mm
Native f/ratiof/3.8f/4.9
Image circle48mm45mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight3.0kg1.6kg
Advantages of William Optics Pleiades 68
  • 33% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.8 vs f/4.9
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 51 WIFD
  • Lighter (1.6kg vs 2.98kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics Pleiades 68
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics RedCat 51 WIFD
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics Pleiades 68 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 7.93° × 5.29°Scale: 2.98"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.18° × 3.46°Scale: 2.98"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 2.49°Scale: 2.98"/px
William Optics RedCat 51 WIFD — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.39° × 3.60°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.59° × 2.59°Scale: 3.10"/px
William Optics Pleiades 68 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics RedCat 51 WIFD — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives