Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics Pleiades 181 vs TEC APO160FL f/7

William Optics Pleiades 181
William Optics

Pleiades 181

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

TEC APO160FL f/7
TEC

APO160FL f/7

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-11% focal length
+13% aperture
Faster by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics Pleiades 181TEC APO160FL f/7
Optics
Typeastrographrefractor
Optical designAstrograph (7-element)Apo triplet fluorite
Aperture181mm160mm
Focal length998mm1120mm
Native f/ratiof/5.5f/7.0
Image circle55mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight15.0kg
Advantages of William Optics Pleiades 181
  • Wider field — 998mm vs 1120mm focal length
  • 13% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (55mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of TEC APO160FL f/7
  • Tighter framing — 1120mm vs 998mm focal length
Best for — William Optics Pleiades 181
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — TEC APO160FL f/7
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
William Optics Pleiades 181 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
TEC APO160FL f/7 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.84° × 1.23°Scale: 0.69"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 0.80°Scale: 0.69"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.58° × 0.58°Scale: 0.69"/px
William Optics Pleiades 181 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

TEC APO160FL f/7 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives