Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics Pleiades 181 vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX

William Optics Pleiades 181
William Optics

Pleiades 181

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 150EDX

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+21% aperture
Faster by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics Pleiades 181Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX
Optics
Typeastrographrefractor
Optical designAstrograph (7-element)Apo triplet
Aperture181mm150mm
Focal length998mm1050mm
Native f/ratiof/5.5f/7.0
Image circle55mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight15.0kg15.2kg
Advantages of William Optics Pleiades 181
  • 21% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (55mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — William Optics Pleiades 181
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics Pleiades 181 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.96° × 1.31°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.28° × 0.86°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.62° × 0.62°Scale: 0.74"/px
William Optics Pleiades 181 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives