Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Unistellar Odyssey vs William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD

Unistellar Odyssey
Unistellar

Odyssey

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD
William Optics

RedCat 71 WIFD

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-9% focal length
+20% aperture
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationUnistellar OdysseyWilliam Optics RedCat 71 WIFD
Optics
Typesmart-telescopeRefractor
Optical designNewtonian reflector all-in-onePetzval APO
Aperture85mm71mm
Focal length320mm350mm
Native f/ratiof/3.9f/4.9
Image circle45mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight4.0kg2.7kg
Advantages of Unistellar Odyssey
  • 20% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.9 vs f/4.9
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD
  • Larger image circle (45mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (2.7kg vs 3.99kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Unistellar Odyssey
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Unistellar Odyssey — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.45° × 4.30°Scale: 2.42"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.21° × 2.81°Scale: 2.42"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.02° × 2.02°Scale: 2.42"/px
William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.89° × 3.93°Scale: 2.22"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.85° × 2.57°Scale: 2.22"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.85° × 1.85°Scale: 2.22"/px
Unistellar Odyssey — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics RedCat 71 WIFD — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives