Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Unistellar Odyssey vs William Optics RedCat 61 WIFD

Unistellar Odyssey
Unistellar

Odyssey

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics RedCat 61 WIFD
William Optics

RedCat 61 WIFD

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+7% focal length
+39% aperture
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationUnistellar OdysseyWilliam Optics RedCat 61 WIFD
Optics
Typesmart-telescopeRefractor
Optical designNewtonian reflector all-in-onePetzval APO
Aperture85mm61mm
Focal length320mm300mm
Native f/ratiof/3.9f/4.9
Image circle45mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight4.0kg2.0kg
Advantages of Unistellar Odyssey
  • 39% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.9 vs f/4.9
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 61 WIFD
  • Larger image circle (45mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (2kg vs 3.99kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Unistellar Odyssey
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — William Optics RedCat 61 WIFD
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Unistellar Odyssey — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.45° × 4.30°Scale: 2.42"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.21° × 2.81°Scale: 2.42"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.02° × 2.02°Scale: 2.42"/px
William Optics RedCat 61 WIFD — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.88° × 4.58°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.49° × 3.00°Scale: 2.59"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.16° × 2.16°Scale: 2.59"/px
Unistellar Odyssey — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics RedCat 61 WIFD — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives