Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Unistellar Odyssey vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED

Unistellar Odyssey
Unistellar

Odyssey

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 80ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-20% focal length
+6% aperture
Faster by 1.1 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationUnistellar OdysseySky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
Optics
Typesmart-telescopeRefractor
Optical designNewtonian reflector all-in-oneTriplet APO
Aperture85mm80mm
Focal length320mm400mm
Native f/ratiof/3.9f/5.0
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight4.0kg5.7kg
Advantages of Unistellar Odyssey
  • Wider field — 320mm vs 400mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/3.9 vs f/5
  • Lighter (3.99kg vs 5.7kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Tighter framing — 400mm vs 320mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Unistellar Odyssey
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Unistellar Odyssey — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.45° × 4.30°Scale: 2.42"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.21° × 2.81°Scale: 2.42"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.02° × 2.02°Scale: 2.42"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Unistellar Odyssey — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives