Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Unistellar eVscope 2 vs William Optics RedCat 91 WIFD

Unistellar eVscope 2
Unistellar

eVscope 2

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics RedCat 91 WIFD
William Optics

RedCat 91 WIFD

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+25% aperture
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationUnistellar eVscope 2William Optics RedCat 91 WIFD
Optics
Typesmart-telescoperefractor
Optical designNewtonian all-in-onePetzval (5-element advanced)
Aperture114mm91mm
Focal length450mm448mm
Native f/ratiof/3.9f/4.9
Image circle55mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight9.0kg4.7kg
Advantages of Unistellar eVscope 2
  • 25% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.9 vs f/4.9
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 91 WIFD
  • Larger image circle (55mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (4.72kg vs 9kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Unistellar eVscope 2
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — William Optics RedCat 91 WIFD
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Unistellar eVscope 2 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
William Optics RedCat 91 WIFD — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.60° × 3.07°Scale: 1.73"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.01° × 2.01°Scale: 1.73"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.45° × 1.45°Scale: 1.73"/px
Unistellar eVscope 2 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics RedCat 91 WIFD — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives