Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Unistellar eVscope 2 vs William Optics Pleiades 111

Unistellar eVscope 2
Unistellar

eVscope 2

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Pleiades 111
William Optics

Pleiades 111

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-15% focal length
Faster by 0.9 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationUnistellar eVscope 2William Optics Pleiades 111
Optics
Typesmart-telescopeastrograph
Optical designNewtonian all-in-oneAstrograph (7-element)
Aperture114mm111mm
Focal length450mm528mm
Native f/ratiof/3.9f/4.8
Image circle45mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight9.0kg8.0kg
Advantages of Unistellar eVscope 2
  • Wider field — 450mm vs 528mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/3.9 vs f/4.8
Advantages of William Optics Pleiades 111
  • Tighter framing — 528mm vs 450mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (45mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Unistellar eVscope 2
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — William Optics Pleiades 111
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Unistellar eVscope 2 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
William Optics Pleiades 111 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.91° × 2.60°Scale: 1.47"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.55° × 1.70°Scale: 1.47"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.23° × 1.23°Scale: 1.47"/px
Unistellar eVscope 2 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Pleiades 111 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives