Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Tele Vue NP127fli vs Askar 107PHQ

Tele Vue NP127fli
Tele Vue

NP127fli

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar 107PHQ
Askar

107PHQ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-12% focal length
+19% aperture
Faster by 1.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTele Vue NP127fliAskar 107PHQ
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designNagler-PetzvalPetzval quintuplet FPL-51
Aperture127mm107mm
Focal length660mm749mm
Native f/ratiof/5.2f/7.0
Image circle52mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight9.5kg7.5kg
Advantages of Tele Vue NP127fli
  • Wider field — 660mm vs 749mm focal length
  • 19% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/5.2 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Askar 107PHQ
  • Tighter framing — 749mm vs 660mm focal length
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 9.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Tele Vue NP127fli
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar 107PHQ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Tele Vue NP127fli — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.08°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.04° × 1.36°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.98° × 0.98°Scale: 1.18"/px
Askar 107PHQ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.04"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.80° × 1.20°Scale: 1.04"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.86° × 0.86°Scale: 1.04"/px
Tele Vue NP127fli — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar 107PHQ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives