Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

TEC APO180FL f/7 vs Takahashi TOA-150B

TEC APO180FL f/7
TEC

APO180FL f/7

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TOA-150B
Takahashi

TOA-150B

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+15% focal length
+20% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationTEC APO180FL f/7Takahashi TOA-150B
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet fluoriteApo triplet
Aperture180mm150mm
Focal length1260mm1100mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/7.3
Image circle88mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight13.5kg
Advantages of TEC APO180FL f/7
  • Tighter framing — 1260mm vs 1100mm focal length
  • 20% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-150B
  • Wider field — 1100mm vs 1260mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — TEC APO180FL f/7
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
Best for — Takahashi TOA-150B
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
TEC APO180FL f/7 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.64° × 1.09°Scale: 0.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.07° × 0.71°Scale: 0.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.51° × 0.51°Scale: 0.62"/px
Takahashi TOA-150B — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.88° × 1.25°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 0.82°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.59° × 0.59°Scale: 0.71"/px
TEC APO180FL f/7 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TOA-150B — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives