telescopecomparison · 2-way
Takahashi FSQ-130ED vs William Optics Ultra-Cat 131
Takahashi
FSQ-130ED
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
William Optics
Ultra-Cat 131
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Specifications
| Specification | Takahashi FSQ-130ED | William Optics Ultra-Cat 131 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval quadruplet | Petzval (5-element advanced) |
| Aperture | 130mm | 131mm |
| Focal length | 650mm | 648mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.0 | f/4.9 |
| Image circle | 88mm | 60mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 11.0kg | 11.3kg |
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-130ED
- Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of William Optics Ultra-Cat 131
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-130ED
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Ultra-Cat 131
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.17° × 2.12°Scale: 1.19"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 1.19"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.19"/px
William Optics Ultra-Cat 131 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.18° × 2.12°Scale: 1.20"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.08° × 1.39°Scale: 1.20"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.20"/px
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
William Optics Ultra-Cat 131 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
