Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-130ED vs William Optics FLT 120

Takahashi FSQ-130ED
Takahashi

FSQ-130ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics FLT 120
William Optics

FLT 120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-17% focal length
+8% aperture
Faster by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-130EDWilliam Optics FLT 120
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designPetzval quadrupletTriplet APO
Aperture130mm120mm
Focal length650mm780mm
Native f/ratiof/5.0f/6.5
Image circle88mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight11.0kg7.7kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Wider field — 650mm vs 780mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/6.5
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
  • Tighter framing — 780mm vs 650mm focal length
  • Lighter (7.7kg vs 11kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.17° × 2.12°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.19"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives