telescopecomparison · 2-way
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 vs William Optics Pleiades 111
Takahashi
FSQ-106EDX4
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
William Optics
Pleiades 111
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Specifications
| Specification | Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 | William Optics Pleiades 111 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Refractor | astrograph |
| Optical design | Petzval APO | Astrograph (7-element) |
| Aperture | 106mm | 111mm |
| Focal length | 530mm | 528mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.0 | f/4.8 |
| Image circle | 88mm | 45mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 7.5kg | 8.0kg |
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
- Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of William Optics Pleiades 111
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Pleiades 111
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
William Optics Pleiades 111 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.91° × 2.60°Scale: 1.47"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.55° × 1.70°Scale: 1.47"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.23° × 1.23°Scale: 1.47"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
William Optics Pleiades 111 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
