Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED vs William Optics Pleiades 111

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Pleiades 111
William Optics

Pleiades 111

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+44% aperture
Faster by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Epsilon-160EDWilliam Optics Pleiades 111
Optics
TypeNewtonianastrograph
Optical designHyperbolic astrographAstrograph (7-element)
Aperture160mm111mm
Focal length530mm528mm
Native f/ratiof/3.3f/4.8
Image circle44mm45mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight10.0kg8.0kg
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • 44% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/4.8
Advantages of William Optics Pleiades 111
  • Lighter (7.95kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Pleiades 111
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
William Optics Pleiades 111 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.91° × 2.60°Scale: 1.47"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.55° × 1.70°Scale: 1.47"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.23° × 1.23°Scale: 1.47"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Pleiades 111 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives