Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 100EDX

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100EDX
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 100EDX

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+60% aperture
Faster by 2.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Epsilon-160EDSky-Watcher Esprit 100EDX
Optics
TypeNewtonianrefractor
Optical designHyperbolic astrographApo triplet
Aperture160mm100mm
Focal length530mm550mm
Native f/ratiof/3.3f/5.5
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight10.0kg7.4kg
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • 60% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/5.5
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 100EDX
  • Lighter (7.36kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 100EDX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 100EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.75° × 2.50°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.45° × 1.64°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 1.18°Scale: 1.41"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100EDX — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives