telescopecomparison · 2-way
Stellarvue SVX152T vs TEC APO160FL f/7
Stellarvue
SVX152T
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.
TEC
APO160FL f/7
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
+7% focal length
Slower by 0.9 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Stellarvue SVX152T | TEC APO160FL f/7 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo triplet | Apo triplet fluorite |
| Aperture | 152mm | 160mm |
| Focal length | 1200mm | 1120mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.9 | f/7.0 |
| Image circle | 60mm | — |
| Full-frame support | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 14.0kg | — |
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX152T
- Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of TEC APO160FL f/7
- Faster optics at f/7 vs f/7.9
Best for — Stellarvue SVX152T
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — TEC APO160FL f/7
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
Stellarvue SVX152T — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.72° × 1.15°Scale: 0.65"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.12° × 0.75°Scale: 0.65"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.54° × 0.54°Scale: 0.65"/px
TEC APO160FL f/7 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.84° × 1.23°Scale: 0.69"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.20° × 0.80°Scale: 0.69"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.58° × 0.58°Scale: 0.69"/px
Stellarvue SVX152T — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.
TEC APO160FL f/7 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
