Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 70EDX vs William Optics GT 71

Sky-Watcher Esprit 70EDX
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 70EDX

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics GT 71
William Optics

GT 71

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+17% focal length
Slower by 1.1 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 70EDXWilliam Optics GT 71
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo tripletApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture70mm71mm
Focal length490mm420mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.9
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight3.2kg3.4kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 70EDX
  • Tighter framing — 490mm vs 420mm focal length
Advantages of William Optics GT 71
  • Wider field — 420mm vs 490mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.9 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 70EDX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics GT 71
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Esprit 70EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.21° × 2.81°Scale: 1.58"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.58"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.32° × 1.32°Scale: 1.58"/px
William Optics GT 71 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.91° × 3.27°Scale: 1.85"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.21° × 2.14°Scale: 1.85"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.54° × 1.54°Scale: 1.85"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 70EDX — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

William Optics GT 71 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives