Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX vs William Optics FLT 156

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 150EDX

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

William Optics FLT 156
William Optics

FLT 156

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 150EDXWilliam Optics FLT 156
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo tripletApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture150mm156mm
Focal length1050mm1085mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/7.0
Image circle52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight15.2kg11.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Advantages of William Optics FLT 156
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (11.5kg vs 15.2kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 156
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.96° × 1.31°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.28° × 0.86°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.62° × 0.62°Scale: 0.74"/px
William Optics FLT 156 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.90° × 1.27°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.24° × 0.83°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.60° × 0.60°Scale: 0.71"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150EDX — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

William Optics FLT 156 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives