Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
cameracomparison · 2-way

Nikon D810A vs ZWO ASI4400MC Pro

Nikon D810A
Nikon

D810A

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

ZWO ASI4400MC Pro
ZWO

ASI4400MC Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

Key differences

Larger pixels (4.88µm vs 4.4µm)
-18% more resolution
Uncooled

Specifications

SpecificationNikon D810AZWO ASI4400MC Pro
Sensor
TypedslrDedicated Cooled
SensorNikon FX astroSony IMX366
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatFull frameFull Frame
Sensor size35.9×24.0mm36.0×24.0mm
Diagonal43.2mm43.3mm
Pixel size4.88µm4.40µm
Resolution7360×49128192×5460
Megapixels36.3MP44.0MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledNoYes
Performance
Full well74600e⁻
Peak QE80%
Advantages of Nikon D810A
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
Advantages of ZWO ASI4400MC Pro
  • Higher resolution (44MP vs 36.3MP)
  • Regulated cooling for long exposures
Best for — Nikon D810A
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — ZWO ASI4400MC Pro
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Nikon D810A — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.23° × 5.50°Scale: 4.03"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.57° × 1.72°Scale: 1.26"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.50"/px
ZWO ASI4400MC Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 3.63"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 1.13"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.45"/px
Nikon D810A — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

ZWO ASI4400MC Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

Recommended alternatives