telescopecomparison · 2-way
DwarfLab Dwarf II vs DwarfLab Dwarf Mini
DwarfLab
Dwarf Mini
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
-33% focal length
-20% aperture
Faster by 0.8 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | DwarfLab Dwarf II | DwarfLab Dwarf Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | smart-telescope | smart-telescope |
| Optical design | Apo doublet all-in-one | Smart all-in-one |
| Aperture | 24mm | 30mm |
| Focal length | 100mm | 150mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/4.2 | f/5.0 |
| Image circle | — | — |
| Full-frame support | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.2kg | 0.8kg |
Advantages of DwarfLab Dwarf II
- Wider field — 100mm vs 150mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/4.2 vs f/5
Advantages of DwarfLab Dwarf Mini
- Tighter framing — 150mm vs 100mm focal length
- 25% more light-gathering aperture
- Lighter (0.84kg vs 1.2kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — DwarfLab Dwarf II
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — DwarfLab Dwarf Mini
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
DwarfLab Dwarf II — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 20.63° × 13.75°Scale: 7.76"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 13.47° × 9.00°Scale: 7.76"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 6.47° × 6.47°Scale: 7.76"/px
DwarfLab Dwarf Mini — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 13.75° × 9.17°Scale: 5.17"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 8.98° × 6.00°Scale: 5.17"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.32° × 4.32°Scale: 5.17"/px
DwarfLab Dwarf II — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
DwarfLab Dwarf Mini — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
