Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron RASA 14 vs Astro-Tech AT115EDT

Celestron RASA 14
Celestron

RASA 14

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT
Astro-Tech

AT115EDT

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+210% aperture
Faster by 4.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron RASA 14Astro-Tech AT115EDT
Optics
Typeastrographrefractor
Optical designRowe-Ackermann Schmidt AstrographApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture356mm115mm
Focal length790mm805mm
Native f/ratiof/2.2f/7.0
Image circle52mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight30.0kg6.6kg
Advantages of Celestron RASA 14
  • 210% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2.22 vs f/7
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Lighter (6.6kg vs 30kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron RASA 14
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron RASA 14 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.61° × 1.74°Scale: 0.98"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.70° × 1.14°Scale: 0.98"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.82° × 0.82°Scale: 0.98"/px
Astro-Tech AT115EDT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.56° × 1.71°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.67° × 1.12°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.80°Scale: 0.96"/px
Celestron RASA 14 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives