Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Borg 107FL vs William Optics Ultra-Cat 108

Borg 107FL
Borg

107FL

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
William Optics

Ultra-Cat 108

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+16% focal length
Slower by 0.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationBorg 107FLWilliam Optics Ultra-Cat 108
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo doublet fluoritePetzval (5-element advanced)
Aperture107mm108mm
Focal length600mm518mm
Native f/ratiof/5.6f/4.8
Image circle60mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight3.5kg8.0kg
Advantages of Borg 107FL
  • Tighter framing — 600mm vs 518mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.5kg vs 7.96kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
  • Wider field — 518mm vs 600mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4.8 vs f/5.6
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Borg 107FL
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Borg 107FL — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.98° × 2.65°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.60° × 1.74°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.25° × 1.25°Scale: 1.50"/px
Borg 107FL — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives