Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Physics 190mm f/6 StarFire CS vs TEC APO160FL f/7

Astro-Physics 190mm f/6 StarFire CS
Astro-Physics

190mm f/6 StarFire CS

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

TEC APO160FL f/7
TEC

APO160FL f/7

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+19% aperture
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Physics 190mm f/6 StarFire CSTEC APO160FL f/7
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designChristen Superachromat (4-element)Apo triplet fluorite
Aperture190mm160mm
Focal length1140mm1120mm
Native f/ratiof/6.0f/7.0
Image circle64mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight17.7kg
Advantages of Astro-Physics 190mm f/6 StarFire CS
  • 19% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/6 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (64mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of TEC APO160FL f/7

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — Astro-Physics 190mm f/6 StarFire CS
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — TEC APO160FL f/7
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
Astro-Physics 190mm f/6 StarFire CS — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.81° × 1.21°Scale: 0.68"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 0.79°Scale: 0.68"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.57° × 0.57°Scale: 0.68"/px
TEC APO160FL f/7 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.84° × 1.23°Scale: 0.69"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 0.80°Scale: 0.69"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.58° × 0.58°Scale: 0.69"/px
Astro-Physics 190mm f/6 StarFire CS — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

TEC APO160FL f/7 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives