Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS vs ZWO FF131 APO

Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS
Astro-Physics

155mm f/6 StarFire CS

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

ZWO FF131 APO
ZWO

FF131 APO

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-5% focal length
+18% aperture
Faster by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CSZWO FF131 APO
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designChristen Superachromat (4-element)Apo quadruplet ED
Aperture155mm131mm
Focal length930mm983mm
Native f/ratiof/6.0f/7.5
Image circle64mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight10.9kg7.9kg
Advantages of Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS
  • 18% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/6 vs f/7.5
  • Larger image circle (64mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of ZWO FF131 APO
  • Lighter (7.9kg vs 10.9kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — ZWO FF131 APO
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.22° × 1.48°Scale: 0.83"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.45° × 0.97°Scale: 0.83"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.83"/px
ZWO FF131 APO — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.10° × 1.40°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.37° × 0.92°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.66°Scale: 0.79"/px
Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

ZWO FF131 APO — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives