Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS vs Askar 151PHQ

Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS
Astro-Physics

155mm f/6 StarFire CS

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar 151PHQ
Askar

151PHQ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-12% focal length
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CSAskar 151PHQ
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designChristen Superachromat (4-element)Petzval quintuplet FPL-51
Aperture155mm151mm
Focal length930mm1057mm
Native f/ratiof/6.0f/7.0
Image circle64mm60mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight10.9kg15.5kg
Advantages of Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS
  • Wider field — 930mm vs 1057mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/6 vs f/7
  • Lighter (10.9kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Askar 151PHQ
  • Tighter framing — 1057mm vs 930mm focal length
Best for — Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar 151PHQ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.22° × 1.48°Scale: 0.83"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.45° × 0.97°Scale: 0.83"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.83"/px
Askar 151PHQ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.95° × 1.30°Scale: 0.73"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.27° × 0.85°Scale: 0.73"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.61° × 0.61°Scale: 0.73"/px
Astro-Physics 155mm f/6 StarFire CS — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar 151PHQ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives