Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar SQA106 vs William Optics Ultra-Cat 108

Askar SQA106
Askar

SQA106

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
William Optics

Ultra-Cat 108

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+12% focal length
Slower by 0.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAskar SQA106William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designQuadruplet astrograph FPL-51Petzval (5-element advanced)
Aperture106mm108mm
Focal length580mm518mm
Native f/ratiof/5.5f/4.8
Image circle60mm60mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight6.5kg8.0kg
Advantages of Askar SQA106
  • Tighter framing — 580mm vs 518mm focal length
  • Lighter (6.5kg vs 7.96kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
  • Wider field — 518mm vs 580mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4.8 vs f/5.5
Best for — Askar SQA106
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics Ultra-Cat 108
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar SQA106 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.56° × 2.37°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.32° × 1.55°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.12° × 1.12°Scale: 1.34"/px
William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.98° × 2.65°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.60° × 1.74°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.25° × 1.25°Scale: 1.50"/px
Askar SQA106 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics Ultra-Cat 108 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives