Astrophotoguru · Compare

Back to planner
telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar 71F vs ZWO FF70 APO

Askar 71F
Askar

71F

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

ZWO FF70 APO
ZWO

FF70 APO

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Specifications

SpecificationAskar 71FZWO FF70 APO
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval quintuplet FPL-51Apo quadruplet ED
Aperture71mm70mm
Focal length490mm490mm
Native f/ratiof/6.9f/7.0
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight3.2kg2.5kg
Advantages of Askar 71F

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Advantages of ZWO FF70 APO
  • Lighter (2.5kg vs 3.2kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar 71F
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — ZWO FF70 APO
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar 71F — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.21° × 2.81°Scale: 1.58"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.58"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.32° × 1.32°Scale: 1.58"/px
ZWO FF70 APO — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.21° × 2.81°Scale: 1.58"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.58"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.32° × 1.32°Scale: 1.58"/px
Askar 71F — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

ZWO FF70 APO — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives