telescopecomparison · 2-way
Askar 65PHQ vs ZWO FF65 APO
Specifications
| Specification | Askar 65PHQ | ZWO FF65 APO |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Quintuplet Petzval | Quintuplet air-spaced APO (two ED elements) |
| Aperture | 65mm | 65mm |
| Focal length | 416mm | 416mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/6.4 | f/6.4 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 3.6kg | 2.0kg |
Advantages of Askar 65PHQ
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Advantages of ZWO FF65 APO
- Lighter (2kg vs 3.6kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar 65PHQ
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — ZWO FF65 APO
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar 65PHQ — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.96° × 3.31°Scale: 1.86"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.24° × 2.16°Scale: 1.86"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.56° × 1.56°Scale: 1.86"/px
ZWO FF65 APO — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.96° × 3.31°Scale: 1.86"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.24° × 2.16°Scale: 1.86"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.56° × 1.56°Scale: 1.86"/px
Askar 65PHQ — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
ZWO FF65 APO — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
